Home/Case Law/ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES)
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES)

Filed: Nov 13, 2017
Oakland
ADJ6620476

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to affirm the applicant's permanent and total disability award, rescinding only one finding of fact regarding the specific Labor Code section relied upon. The Board agreed that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof for apportionment, relying on the agreed medical examiner's opinion. Furthermore, the Board upheld the applicant's entitlement to reimbursement for home health services, finding the defendant received adequate notice and failed to evaluate the need for such care as recommended by medical experts. The decision clarifies that reimbursement for home health care is owed from 14 days prior to the employer's receipt of a physician's report recommending such services.

ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES) is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to affirm the applicant's permanent and total disability award, rescinding only one finding of fact regarding the specific Labor Code section relied upon. The Board agreed that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof for apportionment, relying on the agreed medical examiner's opinion. Furthermore, the Board upheld the applicant's entitlement to reimbursement for home health services, finding the defendant received adequate notice and failed to evaluate the need for such care as recommended by medical experts. The decision clarifies that reimbursement for home health care is owed from 14 days prior to the employer's receipt of a physician's report recommending such services.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES) workers compensation case in Oakland. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES) case law summary from Oakland. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES) Case Analysis

ALEXANDER KAMAKEEAINA vs. SUPER HEAT, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE (ONE OF THE CRUM AND FORSTER GROUP OF COMPANIES) is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Oakland. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.