Home/Case Law/ALEKSANDER YAMNITSKIY vs. MORROW-MEADOWS CORP., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS
Regular DecisionRemoval

ALEKSANDER YAMNITSKIY vs. MORROW-MEADOWS CORP., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS

Filed: Dec 29, 2008
ADJ1403472

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, which sought dismissal of the applicant's claim based on a collective bargaining agreement's alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provisions. The Board found insufficient evidence regarding the operative eligibility letter for the ADR plan at the time of the applicant's injury. The case is returned to the trial level to determine if the defendant can provide the necessary documentation to establish the ADR plan's applicability and warrant dismissal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, which sought dismissal of the applicant's claim based on a collective bargaining agreement's alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provisions. The Board found insufficient evidence regarding the operative eligibility letter for the ADR plan at the time of the applicant's injury. The case is returned to the trial level to determine if the defendant can provide the necessary documentation to establish the ADR plan's applicability and warrant dismissal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ALEKSANDER YAMNITSKIY vs. MORROW-MEADOWS CORP., ST. PAUL TRAVELERS (2008) – | CompFox