Home/Case Law/ALEJANDRO ROMERO GARFIAS vs. FETZER VINEYARDS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

ALEJANDRO ROMERO GARFIAS vs. FETZER VINEYARDS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Mar 09, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ2541109

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed attorney Edwin Bridges' Petition for Removal because it was the improper procedural vehicle to challenge a sanction order. The Board found the January 5, 2012 sanction order was final and should have been challenged via a Petition for Reconsideration, not Removal. Furthermore, the Board noted that even if treated as a Petition for Reconsideration, it would have been denied. Bridges' argument of denied due process was rejected as he received notice and an opportunity to be heard on the sanctions.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed attorney Edwin Bridges' Petition for Removal because it was the improper procedural vehicle to challenge a sanction order. The Board found the January 5, 2012 sanction order was final and should have been challenged via a Petition for Reconsideration, not Removal. Furthermore, the Board noted that even if treated as a Petition for Reconsideration, it would have been denied. Bridges' argument of denied due process was rejected as he received notice and an opportunity to be heard on the sanctions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ALEJANDRO ROMERO GARFIAS vs. FETZER VINEYARDS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (2012) – San Francisco | CompFox