Home/Case Law/AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Aug 19, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2575086 (SFO0435675)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because reconsideration is only available for final orders, and the WCJ's discovery order compelling Social Security earnings and a third deposition was procedural, not final. The Board also denied the applicant's Petition for Removal, finding no showing of significant prejudice or irreparable harm necessary for this extraordinary remedy. The applicant's arguments regarding dilatory discovery and prior findings were unpersuasive in justifying removal. Therefore, the applicant's petitions were dismissed and denied.

AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because reconsideration is only available for final orders, and the WCJ's discovery order compelling Social Security earnings and a third deposition was procedural, not final. The Board also denied the applicant's Petition for Removal, finding no showing of significant prejudice or irreparable harm necessary for this extraordinary remedy. The applicant's arguments regarding dilatory discovery and prior findings were unpersuasive in justifying removal. Therefore, the applicant's petitions were dismissed and denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

AIRION RAPAPORT vs. PENN/CML-ZIFF DAVIS PUBLISHING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, INTERCARE HOLDING, RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.