CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the Washington Redskins and their insurer, Hartford Insurance Company, concerning a workers' compensation award. The petition was dismissed because it was filed beyond the statutory 25-day deadline after the initial Findings and Award were issued. Even if considered on its merits, the Board would have denied reconsideration based on the provided report and recommendation. The Judge's report details that the applicant, African Grant, sustained a cumulative trauma injury over his football career, and the dismissal was based solely on the untimeliness of the petition.
African Grant vs. Washington Redskins, Hartford Insurance Company is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by the Washington Redskins and their insurer, Hartford Insurance Company, concerning a workers' compensation award. The petition was dismissed because it was filed beyond the statutory 25-day deadline after the initial Findings and Award were issued. Even if considered on its merits, the Board would have denied reconsideration based on the provided report and recommendation. The Judge's report details that the applicant, African Grant, sustained a cumulative trauma injury over his football career, and the dismissal was based solely on the untimeliness of the petition.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.