CompFox AI Summary
This case involves petitions for reconsideration from Dr. Ronald Grusd and California Imaging Network (CIN) regarding the dismissal of their liens by the WCJ. CIN's petition was dismissed as facially defective because no lien for them was identified in the file. Dr. Grusd's petition was denied because he failed to appear at a lien conference and did not object to the subsequent notice of intent to dismiss, and his claim of excusable neglect was unsubstantiated. The Board found no good cause to overturn the WCJ's justified dismissal of the liens.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves petitions for reconsideration from Dr. Ronald Grusd and California Imaging Network (CIN) regarding the dismissal of their liens by the WCJ. CIN's petition was dismissed as facially defective because no lien for them was identified in the file. Dr. Grusd's petition was denied because he failed to appear at a lien conference and did not object to the subsequent notice of intent to dismiss, and his claim of excusable neglect was unsubstantiated. The Board found no good cause to overturn the WCJ's justified dismissal of the liens.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.