CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Adam Timmerman's claim for workers' compensation benefits against the St. Louis Rams and their insurers. The WCAB found that Timmerman's participation in 14 games in California, out of 189 total games in his career, did not establish a sufficient connection to California to justify the application of California workers' compensation law. This decision followed the precedent set in Federal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson), which requires a legitimate and substantial connection between the injury and the state for jurisdiction. The majority affirmed the WCJ's findings, concluding that California lacked a substantial interest in adjudicating this claim.
ADAM TIMMERMAN, vs. ST. LOUIS RAMS, LLC; GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Adam Timmerman's claim for workers' compensation benefits against the St. Louis Rams and their insurers. The WCAB found that Timmerman's participation in 14 games in California, out of 189 total games in his career, did not establish a sufficient connection to California to justify the application of California workers' compensation law. This decision followed the precedent set in Federal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson), which requires a legitimate and substantial connection between the injury and the state for jurisdiction. The majority affirmed the WCJ's findings, concluding that California lacked a substantial interest in adjudicating this claim.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.