CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a lien claimant seeking reconsideration of a decision disallowing their lien for copying services. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) initially found no substantial evidence that the services were reasonable and necessary because there was no "contested claim." However, the Appeals Board rescinded the decision, finding the ALJ's reasoning based on stipulations and the "immediately accepted case" status was insufficient. The Board remanded the case for further proceedings, emphasizing that a contested claim exists when an employer rejects liability or fails to respond to benefit demands, and the lien claimant bears the burden of proving this.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a lien claimant seeking reconsideration of a decision disallowing their lien for copying services. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) initially found no substantial evidence that the services were reasonable and necessary because there was no "contested claim." However, the Appeals Board rescinded the decision, finding the ALJ's reasoning based on stipulations and the "immediately accepted case" status was insufficient. The Board remanded the case for further proceedings, emphasizing that a contested claim exists when an employer rejects liability or fails to respond to benefit demands, and the lien claimant bears the burden of proving this.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.