CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior award denying additional temporary disability payments beyond the statutory 104-week limit. The applicant sought to extend payments based on his knee surgeries, arguing they constituted amputations under Labor Code section 4656(c)(2)(C). The Board held that the term amputation in this context refers to the severance of external body parts, not the surgical removal of internal knee fragments or cartilage.
ADAM PERRY vs. HAMMOND & MASING CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior award denying additional temporary disability payments beyond the statutory 104-week limit. The applicant sought to extend payments based on his knee surgeries, arguing they constituted "amputations" under Labor Code section 4656(c)(2)(C). The Board held that the term "amputation" in this context refers to the severance of external body parts, not the surgical removal of internal knee fragments or cartilage.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.