Home/Case Law/ADAM FRY vs. WAVE DIVISION HOLDINGS, THE HARTFORD
Regular Decision

ADAM FRY vs. WAVE DIVISION HOLDINGS, THE HARTFORD

Filed: Jul 19, 2012
Sacramento
ADJ8036975

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order as required by statute. The order in question was an interlocutory procedural decision, not one determining substantive rights or liabilities. Removal was also denied as the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order as required by statute. The order in question was an interlocutory procedural decision, not one determining substantive rights or liabilities. Removal was also denied as the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ADAM FRY vs. WAVE DIVISION HOLDINGS, THE HARTFORD (2012) – Sacramento | CompFox