Home/Case Law/ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT

Filed: Nov 19, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ2134688 (ANA 0372559)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns TIG Insurance's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Arbitrator's (WCA) decision regarding cumulative trauma injury benefits for professional football player Trey Junkin. The WCA found the cumulative trauma ended January 9, 2003, and ordered TIG to reimburse Gulf/Travelers for 83% of rehabilitation benefits paid until February 9, 2004, due to Junkin's return to work. The Board denied TIG's petition, affirming the WCA's jurisdiction over vested rehabilitation benefits and upholding the allocation of liability based on prior final findings of fact regarding employment periods and the date of injury. The Board also affirmed the WCA's discretion in transferring the administration of future benefits to TIG.

ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns TIG Insurance's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Arbitrator's (WCA) decision regarding cumulative trauma injury benefits for professional football player Trey Junkin. The WCA found the cumulative trauma ended January 9, 2003, and ordered TIG to reimburse Gulf/Travelers for 83% of rehabilitation benefits paid until February 9, 2004, due to Junkin's return to work. The Board denied TIG's petition, affirming the WCA's jurisdiction over vested rehabilitation benefits and upholding the allocation of liability based on prior final findings of fact regarding employment periods and the date of injury. The Board also affirmed the WCA's discretion in transferring the administration of future benefits to TIG.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT Case Analysis

ABNER K. JUNKIN III (TREY JUNKIN) vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS/TIG INSURANCE as administered by RISK ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.