Home/Case Law/ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF)
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF)

Filed: Aug 19, 2015
Los Angeles
ADJ8475204

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision finding the applicant excluded from workers' compensation coverage under Labor Code section 3352(h). The applicant was hired by Mr. Lai as a homeowner for less than 52 hours in the 90 days prior to his injury, and his duties were incidental to the maintenance of a residential dwelling, not Mr. Lai's business. The majority found that applicant's work at Mr. Lai's personal residence did not fall within the course of Mr. Lai's alleged business of managing rental properties. The dissenting opinion argued that Mr. Lai's management of multiple rental properties and arrangement of work for the applicant constituted a business, making the applicant an employee rather than an excluded casual residential employee.

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF) is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision finding the applicant excluded from workers' compensation coverage under Labor Code section 3352(h). The applicant was hired by Mr. Lai as a homeowner for less than 52 hours in the 90 days prior to his injury, and his duties were incidental to the maintenance of a residential dwelling, not Mr. Lai's business. The majority found that applicant's work at Mr. Lai's personal residence did not fall within the course of Mr. Lai's alleged business of managing rental properties. The dissenting opinion argued that Mr. Lai's management of multiple rental properties and arrangement of work for the applicant constituted a business, making the applicant an employee rather than an excluded casual residential employee.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF) workers compensation case in Los Angeles. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF) case law summary from Los Angeles. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF) Case Analysis

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF) is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Los Angeles. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ABEL REYES GARCIA vs. LEE LAI, STATE FARM INSURANCE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND (UEBTF) (2015) – Los Angeles | CompFox | CompFox