Home/Case Law/ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al.
Significant DecisionEn Banc

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al.

Filed: Jun 17, 2024
SAN FRANCISCO
ADJ13332737, ADJ15218980, ADJ12640295

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board consolidates three cases to address sanctions against attorney Susan Garrett and hearing representative Lance Garrett for filing petitions for reconsideration with the intent to disrupt or delay trial proceedings, issuing a notice of intent to impose sanctions and costs.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. is a workers' compensation case decided in SAN FRANCISCO. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in SAN FRANCISCO.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board consolidates three cases to address sanctions against attorney Susan Garrett and hearing representative Lance Garrett for filing petitions for reconsideration with the intent to disrupt or delay trial proceedings, issuing a notice of intent to impose sanctions and costs.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. workers compensation case in SAN FRANCISCO. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. case law summary from SAN FRANCISCO. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. Case Analysis

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in SAN FRANCISCO. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. (2024) – SAN FRANCISCO | CompFox | CompFox