Home/Case Law/ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al.
Significant DecisionEn Banc

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al.

Los Angeles
ADJ13332737, ADJ15218980, ADJ12640295

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board imposed sanctions totaling $15,000 against attorneys Susan Garrett and Lance Garrett for filing frivolous petitions for reconsideration with the willful intent to disrupt or delay court proceedings.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board imposed sanctions totaling $15,000 against attorneys Susan Garrett and Lance Garrett for filing frivolous petitions for reconsideration with the willful intent to disrupt or delay court proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. workers compensation case in Los Angeles. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. case law summary from Los Angeles. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. Case Analysis

ABEL HIDALGO, et al. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK, et al. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Los Angeles. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.