ADJ6526788In this case, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration and amended the decision of December 24, 2013. The amendment stated that True Scan Legal Copy Service failed to meet their burden of proof to prove up their lien and shall take nothing. The decision was affirmed, except for the amendment.
In this case, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a supplemental decision allowing reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the defendant, The City of Riverside, and its counsel, the Law Offices of Brian W. Collins, Inc., arising from the bad faith actions and tactics by Carl Feldman and The Law Offices of Carl Feldman. The amount of the fees and costs was to be adjusted by the parties, with jurisdiction reserved at the trial level.
In this case, Pedro McKay sought reconsideration of a workers’ compensation administrative law judge’s (WCJ) decision that he did not sustain a cumulative industrial injury from September 15, 2007 to September 15, 2008. The WCJ denied his petition and the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board upheld the decision. The Board also found that the petition was timely filed and properly served.
is a case in which Pedro McKay, the applicant, sought reconsideration of evidentiary rulings issued during the trial of his claim. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration and denied the petition for removal, and issued a notice of intention to impose sanctions against the Law Offices of Carl Feldman and Carl Feldman, Esq. and to allow reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the defendant, the City of Riverside.
In this case, Pedro McKay, an applicant, filed a Petition for Reconsideration and Petition for Removal following the September 16, 2010 Order taking his case off calendar made by a workers’ compensation administrative law judge. The Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed and the Petition for Removal was denied as the order taking the case off calendar was a procedural order and did not determine any right or liability of any party, and there was no prejudice or irreparable harm resulting to the applicant.
This case involves Pedro McKay, who was a waste water collection system technician from September 15, 2007 to September 15, 2008. He filed a claim for cumulative injury to his digestive system, neck, right shoulder, psyche, internal, liver and abdomen, and in the form of diabetes, headaches, sleep loss and sexual dysfunction. The Workers’ Compensation Administrative Law Judge admitted his 25 exhibits into evidence, including reports from the Panel Qualified Medical Evaluator. McKay sought reconsideration or removal following the first day of trial, but the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board dismissed his Petition for Reconsideration and denied his Petition for Removal, as they found no prejudice or irreparable harm resulting to him.
is a case in which the defendant, City of Riverside, sought removal/reconsideration of an order denying its motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, as there was no order subject to reconsideration, and denied the petition for removal, as the defendant failed to establish that the order would result in significant prejudice or irreparable harm.
