News and Insights

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur sit amet sem id nisi porta rutrum.

Peter Duffy vs. Finchley Motors, Inc., Dba Pacific Bmw; Travelers Property Casualty Company Of America

Finchley Motors, Inc., dba Pacific BMW; Travelers Property Casualty Company Of America Peter Duffy WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAPETER DUFFY, Applicant,vs.FINCHLEY MOTORS, INC., dba PACIFIC BMW;TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANYOF AMERICA, Defendants.Case No. ADJ7728569 (Marina del Rey District Office)ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION            We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in the WCJ’s report, which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration.            We return this matter to the trial level for such further proceedings and decisions by the WCJ as may be required, including issues regarding the applicability of Labor Code section 4658(d)./ / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / / ,             For the foregoing reasons,            IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration is DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_________________________________________ALFONSO J. MORESII CONCUR,_________________________________________   MARGUERITE SWEENEY_________________________________________   FRANK M. BRASSDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA   JUN 18 2013SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.GORDON EDELSTEINPETER DUFFYSCOLL ASSOCIATESmm , CASE NUMBER: ADJ7728569PETER DUFFYVS.FINCHEY MOTORS; TRAVELERS PROP. CASUALTY CO.JUDGE: GILBERT KATENDATE OF INJURY: APRIL 30, 2001 – JAN. 19, 2011REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONINTRODUCTIONPetitioner: Carrier, Travelers Property Casualty Co.Timeliness: TimelyVerification: Not verifiedDecision challenged: Findings and Award and Orders (“FAO”) of April 10, 2013, finding 75% permanent partial disability, based upon the factors of disabil

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Get exclusive access to in-debt interviews.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor.

Recent Article

Recent Article

Share Article

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *