News and Insights

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur sit amet sem id nisi porta rutrum.

Guadalupe Camacho, vs. One Hour Valley Cleaners; Preferred Employers Insurance Company,

ONE HOUR VALLEY CLEANERS; PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, GUADALUPE CAMACHO, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAGUADALUPE CAMACHO, Applicant,vs.ONE HOUR VALLEY CLEANERS;PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.Case Nos. ADJ3722191 (GRO 0028583)ADJ916711 (GRO 0033193)OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION            Defendant seeks reconsideration of the February 11, 2009 Findings and Award of the Workers’ Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), as served on the parties on July 29, 2009, wherein the WCJ allowed the lien claim of the Employment Development Department (EDD) and issued an award against defendant for the amount of the lien. Applicant’s claim of industrial injury to her right elbow wrist and left thumb while working for defendant as a laundry worker/clothes presser on September 22, 2002, was earlier addressed on April 8, 2008 by entry of a stipulated award of 47% permanent disability and future medical treatment. At that time, defendant also agreed to adjust or litigate EDD’s lien.            Defendant contends that it should have been given credit for the EDD lien against applicant’s award of permanent disability pursuant to Labor Code section 4909.1            We deny reconsideration. Defendant was aware of EDD’s lien when it paid applicant her permanent disability award but failed to withhold the money for EDD. Under the circumstances of this case, the WCJ properly exercised his discretion under section 4909 to deny defendant credit 1Further statutory references are to the Labor Code. , for the resulting overpayment. Although we do not find that estoppel applies to preclude defendant’s claim for credit as indicated by the WCJ in his Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report), which is incorporated by this reference, section 4909 authorizes the WCAB to exercise discretion in deciding whether to allow credit for an indemnity benefit overpayment. Here, it would be inequitable to allow defe

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Join our community and never miss an update. Stay connected with cutting-edge insights and valuable resources.

Recent Article

Recent Article

Share Article

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *