News and Insights

ERNEST MILLETTE vs. 81 GRAND HOLDINGS, INC., Dba CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION And ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC On Behalf Of PROCENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY,

81 GRAND HOLDINGS, INC., dba CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION and ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC on behalf of PROCENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, ERNEST MILLETTE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAERNEST MILLITTE, Applicant,vs.81 GRAND HOLDINGS, INC., dba CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION and ILLINOIS MIDWEST INSURANCE    AGENCY, LLC on behalf of PROCENTURY    INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.Case No. ADJ9349861(San Jose District Office)ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION  We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the  report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our  review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will  deny reconsideration.  In adopting the WCJ’s Report, we observe that, because this case involves a September 11, 2013  injury, the reference to “Section 9792.9(b)(2)(C)” [sic]1 at page 2 should be to “Section  9792.9.1 (b)(l)(C?” and that the references to “Rule 9792.9(b)(1)(D)” at pages 3 and 5 (twice) should be  to “Rule 9792.9.1(b)(1)(D).”  Furthermoire, we admonish defendant’s counsel for misstating the evidence on causation. 1 Actually, Section I 792.9(b)(1)(C). , For the foregoing reasons,IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Reconsideration be, and it hereby is, DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_______________________________________________RONNIE G. CAPLANEI CONCUR, _______________________________________________  NEIL P. SULLIVAN  CONCURRING, BUT NOT SIGNING_______MARGUERITE SWEENEY______________DATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA  AUG 08, 2014SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIRADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD. BRADFORD & BARTHELBUTTS & JOHNSONERNEST MILLETTEebc , Worker’s Compensation Appeals BoardState of CaliforniaErnest Millette vs California Rehabilitation and ProcenturyInsurance Co., adjusted by

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Join our community and never miss an update. Stay connected with cutting-edge insights and valuable resources.

Recent Article

Recent Article

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *