News and Insights

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur sit amet sem id nisi porta rutrum.

Diana Ochoa vs. County Of Los Angeles Department Of Public Social Services Sedgwick Cms

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES SEDGWICK CMS DIANA OCHOA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIADIANA OCHOA, Applicant,vs.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES;SEDGWICK CMS, Defendants.Case No. ADJ9058932(Anaheim District Office)OPINION AND ORDERSDISMISSING PETITION FORREMOVAL ANDDISMISSING PETITION FORRECONSIDERATION            Defendant, County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Social Services, permissibly self- insured, has filed a petition seeking the removal of this matter to the Appeals Board pursuant to Labor Code section 5310, for review of an order of a workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) ordering defendant to pay applicant’s attorney a Labor Code section 5710 deposition fee of$1,300.            Defendant contends it was denied due process of law when the WCJ informed defendant in correspondence that he overruled its timely objection to the order to pay applicant’s attorney’s deposition fee of $1,3 00, and failed to provide defendant with an opportunity to present evidence to show that applicant’s attorney’s fee, based upon a rate of $400 per hour, was not reasonable.            For the reasons set forth below, we shall dismiss defendant’s petition for removal. Treating defendant’s petition as seeking reconsideration from a final order, we will also dismiss it as having been untimely filed.I.            Defendant took applicant’s deposition on January 13, 2014. Applicant’s attorney submitted a petition for deposition fees pursuant to Labor Code section 5710 on April 1, 2014. The petition requested a fee of $1,3 00 for 3 .25 hours at the rate of $400 per hour.            The WCJ issued an order on April 7, 2014, allowing the fee request in full, but provided: “In the event of a written objection, setting forth good cause, is filed and served within 20 days after service , hereof, this Order shall be of no force or effect.”            In response, defendant filed two objecti

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Join our community and never miss an update. Stay connected with cutting-edge insights and valuable resources.

Recent Article

Recent Article

Share Article

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *