News and Insights

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur sit amet sem id nisi porta rutrum.

Carolyn Bertrand vs. County Of Orange Permissibly Self-insured York

COUNTY OF ORANGE permissibly self-insured YORK CAROLYN BERTRAND WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIACAROLYN BERTRAND, Applicant,vs.COUNTY OF ORANGE, permissibly self-insured; YORK, Defendants.Case No. ADJ3135829 (AHM 0099139)OPINION AND ORDERSDISMISSING PETITION FORRECONSIDERATION;GRANTING REMOVAL ANDDECISION AFTERREMOVAL            Defendant, County of Orange, permissibly self-insured, seeks reconsideration of the Findings and Order, issued May 19, 2014, in which a workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) put into effect the parties’ stipulation in their July 20, 2004 Stipulations with Request for Award, that all future disputes regarding medical treatment would be referred to Dr. Lynn Wilson, the Agreed Medical Examiner (AME).            Defendant contends the WCJ’s order to return to the AME misconstrued the parties’ stipulation, and that the intent of the stipulation was to return to the AME in the event of a dispute after the Utilization Review (UR) process, and not to circumvent UR. Defendant asserts, however, that the new Independent Medical Review (IMR) process supersedes the parties’ stipulation to have the AME resolve treatment disputes.            The WCJ has prepared a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration recommending the petition be denied. Applicant has filed an answer contending that the WCJ properly concluded that the parties are bound by their contractual agreement to resolve medical disputes outside the statutory framework.            We shall dismiss defendant’s petition for reconsideration, as the WCJ’s order to have treatment requests referred to the AME for determination is not a final order from which reconsideration may be sought. However, we shall treat defendant’s petition as seeking removal of this matter to the Appeals , Board, and will grant removal to amend the Findings and Order to reflect that the parties’ stipulation may be enforced to require their medical treatment disputes be d


Get exclusive access to in-debt interviews.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor.

Recent Article

Recent Article

Share Article

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *