Sears, Roebuck & Company; All State Insurance, Administered By Specialty Risk Services Syrus Parvizian WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIASYRUS PARVIZIAN, Applicant,vs.SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY; ALL STATE INSURANCE, Administered By SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ3030717; ADJ1719435; ADJ862964ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration. , For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Reconsideration be, and it hereby is, DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD________________________________________JAMES C. CUNEOI CONCUR,________________________________________RONNIE G. CAPLANE________________________________________DEIDRA E. LOWEDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIAAUG 02 2010SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.SYRUS PARVIZIANLAW OFFICES OF DANIEL P. GOGGINSLAW OFFICE OF LEVY, STERN & FORDcsl , STATE OF CALIFORNIADIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATIONWORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDWCAB Case No(s). ADJ 3030717 (VNO 0207174)SYRUS PARVIZIAN, APPLICANTVS.SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY; ALL STATE INSURANCE, – ADMINISTERED BY SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES, DEFENDANT(S)WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGEDAVID L. POLLAK JUNE 30, 2010REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATIONADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONINTRODUCTION:On June 28, 2010, the Applicant filed an untimely but verified Petition forReconsideration dated May 17, 2010 alleging that the undersigned WCJ erred in hisFindings of Fact & Award and Opinion on Decision dated April 26, 2010. TheApplicant contends that: (1) the u
