Susan Britt vs. County Of Los Angeles; Thomas Staffing Services

In this case, the County of Los Angeles and Thomas Staffing Services were contesting a lien claim from David Silver, M.D. for medical treatment he provided to the applicant from June 22, 1999 through June 30, 2000. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the March 9, 2010 Joint Findings and Award, returning the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision with an opinion that properly addresses all issues in dispute. The issues to be addressed include the amount of the fee due Dr. Silver, the basis for any penalty that is awarded, the rate of interest allowed against any award, and the time period that interest is charged.

County of Los Angeles; Thomas Staffing Services Susan Britt WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIASUSAN BRITT, Applicant,vs.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; THOMAS STAFFING SERVICES, Defendant.DAVID SILVER, M.D., Lien claimant.Case No. ADJ3096300 (VNO 0326012),ADJ4162370 (VNO 0346321)OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISIONAFTER RECONSIDERATION            Lien claimant David Silver, M.D., seeks reconsideration of the March 9, 2010 Joint Findings and Award of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) who relied upon the Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) to find that lien claimant is entitled to a fee of $2,174.54 for medical treatment he provided applicant from June 22, 1999 through June 30, 2000, and awarded the $713.52 differenice between that amount and the $1,461.02 defendant earlier paid against lien claimant’s total billings of $4,079.15. The WCJ also awarded a 10% penalty, “and interest [at an unspecified rate] starting from the sixty-first (61) day after the date of the last payment made by defendant.” (Bracketed material added.)            Applicant’s claims of industrial injury to various body parts and fibromyalgia while working as a senior word processor for defendant during the period March 1994 through April 1997 were earlier settled by compromise and release with a lump sum payment of $100,000, as approved by a different WCJ on July 29, 2002.            Lien claimant contends that the OMFS was improperly applied to determine the awarded fee because the OMFS does not apply to workers’ compensation claims that are denied, as , occurred in this case, and for that reason lien claimant is entitled to recover his entire usual and customary fee as he billed. Lien claimant further contends that the WCJ should have specified interest on the award at the rate of 10%, beginning on the date defendant received lien claimant’s bill and not 61 days after the date of the last payment.            A response to the petition was

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.