Roxanne Mosley vs. Oakland Unified School District, Permissibly Self-insured, Administered By Jt2 Integrated Resources

In this case, the Oakland Unified School District, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By JT2 Integrated Resources, is appealing the dismissal of Roxanne Mosley's workers' compensation claim for her September 5, 1999 admitted low back injury. The Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the law firm of Pegnim & Ivancich and issued a notice of their intention to affirm the WCJ's February 22, 2010 Order if no written objections were filed showing good cause as to why the claim should not be dismissed. After no objections were received, the Board issued their decision affirming the WCJ's February 22, 2010 Order dismissing applicant's workers' compensation claim.

Oakland Unified School District, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By JT2 Integrated Resources Roxanne Mosley WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAROXANNE MOSLEY, Applicant,vs.OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By JT2 INTEGRATED RESOURCES, Defendant(s)Case No. ADJ4442534 (OAK 0266174)OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            On May 17, 2010, the Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the law firm of Pegnim & Ivancich (on behalf of applicant though not representing her), which sought reconsideration of the February 22, 2010 Order dismissing applicant’s workers’ compensation case issued by a workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). We also issued a notice of our intention to affirm the WCJ’s February 22, 2010 Order if no written objections were filed showing good cause as to why the claim should not be dismissed. We granted reconsideration and issued the notice in an effort to ensure that applicant had proper notice that her workers’ compensation claim for her September 5, 1999 admitted low back injury was in the process of being dismissed. The Board now issues its decision.1            Reconsideration was sought based on the contention that the WCJ erred in dismissing applicant’s claim where it was not clear that applicant was given proper notice that her case was to be dismissed. Mr. Pegnim argued that applicant was entitled to a hearing so she could state whether she was interested in pursuing her claim. An Answer was filed by the Law Offices of Pomper and Dettenhaim in its capacity as the Custodian of Records of the Law Office of Rosa 1 Although Commissioner Cuneo participated in the initial grant of reconsideration, Commissioner Alfonso J. Moresi has been substituted in for Commissioner Cuneo due to the latter’s retirement. , Moran, the law firm which represented applicant at the time the workers’ compensation claim was filed on June 7, 2000. Applicant appears to

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.