Roberto Reyes, vs. New Image Foam Products Inc.; Everest National Insurance Company,

(STK 183882) is a case between Roberto Reyes, the applicant, and New Image Foam Products Inc. and Everest National Insurance Company, the defendants. The case involves a workers' compensation claim for an industrial injury to Reyes' back on May 1, 2003 while employed by the defendant. The workers' compensation administrative law judge found that Reyes incurred a period of temporary disability, permanent disability of 10% without apportionment, and need for future medical treatment. The judge utilized the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (2005 PDRS) instead of the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (1997 PDRS). Reyes argued that the 1997 PDRS should have been used to rate his permanent disability instead of the 2005 PDRS. After careful review of the

NEW IMAGE FOAM PRODUCTS INC.; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ROBERTO REYES, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAROBERTO REYES, Applicant,vs.NEW IMAGE FOAM PRODUCTS INC.;EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant,Case No. ADJ1946553 (STK 183882)OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            We previously granted applicant’s petition for reconsideration of the July 2, 2008 Findings, Award and Orders of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ), wherein it was found that applicant incurred industrial injury to his back on May 1, 2003, while employed by defendant as a laborer, causing a period of temporary disability, permanent disability of 10% without apportionment, and need for future medical treatment. In rating applicant’s permanent disability, the WCJ utilized the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (2005 PDRS) instead of the 1997 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (1997 PDRS).            Applicant contends that the 1997 PDRS should have been used to rate his permanent disability instead of the 2005 PDRS.            We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the allegations of applicant’s petition for reconsideration and the WCJ’s Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report) with respect thereto. For the reasons stated by the WCJ in his Report, which is incorporated by this reference, we affirm the July 2, 2008 Findings, Award and Orders.//////////// ,             For the foregoing reasons,            IT IS ORDERED as the decision after reconsideration of the Appeals Board that the July 2, 2008 Findings, Award and Orders of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge in STK 183882 is AFFIRMED.        WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD        ________________________________        JOSEPH M. MILLERI CONCUR,________________________________        ALFONSO J. MORESII Dissent,(See attached Dissenting Opinion.)________________________________        FRANK M. BRASSDATED AND

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.