Raul Perez vs. Usa Waste Services; National Union Fire Insurance Company

In this case, Raul Perez, an employee of USA Waste Services, sustained an industrial injury to his back, psyche and neck on September 17, 1998. Langlink Interpreters, Inc. (LC) filed a lien for interpreter services at applicant's appointments with treating physicians between 2006 and 2010 in the amount of $5,175. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the Petition for Reconsideration filed by LC and rescinded the Findings and Order dated January 10, 2011, returning the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board held that the employer is required to provide reasonably required interpreter services during medical treatment appointments for an injured worker who is unable to speak, understand, or communicate in English, and

USA Waste Services; National Union Fire Insurance Company Raul Perez WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIARAUL PEREZ, Applicant,vs.USA WASTE SERVICES; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.Case No. ADJ3564079 (SDO 0254307) OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            On March 7, 2011, we granted the Petition for Reconsideration filed by lien claimant, Langlink Interpreters, Inc. (LC), in order to allow sufficient opportunity to further study the factual and legal issues in this case. This is our Decision After Reconsideration.1            Applicant, while employed as a driver on September 17, 1998, sustained an industrial injury to his back, psyche and neck. On March 25, 2002, he received a stipulated Award of 64% permanent disability and need for future medical treatment.            LC filed a lien for interpreter services at applicant’s appointments with treating physicians between 2006 and 2010 in the amount of $5,175. Defendant denied the lien. After trial on December 9, 2010, the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) issued a Findings and Order disallowing the lien. In his Opinion on Decision, the WCJ stated that LC failed to produce medical reports indicating that the interpreter services were provided in conjunction with treatment for applicant’s industrial injury; and failed to prove that the interpreter services were necessary, because the physician had a Spanish-speaking staff member; and that interpreter services were not pre-authorized.            In its petition for reconsideration, LC contends that interpreter services are authorized under 1            This matter had to be reassigned to a new Appeals Board panelist since prior panelist, Commissioner James C. Cuneo, was no longer sitting as a Commissioner. , Labor Code section 4600;2 that LC’s charges were only for appointments with applicant’s treating doctor; and that there is no legal requirement for pre-authorization of interpreter services. Defe

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.