Muranaka Farm, Inc.; Insurance Company Of The West Raul Gonzales WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIARAUL GONZALEZ, Applicant,vs.MURANAKA FARM, INC.; INSURANCECOMPANY OF THE WEST, Defendants.Case Nos. ADJ7008325ADJ7115616ADJ7111075(Oxnard District Office)ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REMOVAL We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny removal. To the extent that defendant’s petition can be construed as a petition for disqualification, we deny it for reasons set forth by the WCJ in her Report and Recommendation, which we adopt and incorporate herein.////////////////////////////// , For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Removal is DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_________________________________________MARGUERITE SWEENEYI CONCUR,_________________________________________ FRANK M. BRASS_________________________________________ ALFONSO J. MORESIDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAJUN 07 2013SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.DIETZ, GILMOR & CHAZENMGDESYAN LAW FIRMebc , STATE OF CALIFORNIADivision of Workers’ CompensationWorkers’ Compensation Appeals BoardCASE NUMBER: ADJ7008325RAUL GONZALEZ-vs.-MURANAKA FARM INC; INSURANCECO OF THE WEST SAN DIEGO;WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:Bonita A. EdelbergREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S PETITION FOR REMOVALI. INTRODUCTION This matter came on for hearing on the trial calendar of the undersigned on October 23, 2012. The matter was continued on the basis of a “change of circumstances” which one of the parties explained in the comment section as “(
