Ramiro Arteaga vs. Fibre Containers Company, Dba Fleetwood Fibre And Packaging; Safeco, Administered By Liberty Mutual Insurance

In this case, Ramiro Arteaga filed a Petition for Reconsideration against Fibre Containers Company, dba Fleetwood Fibre and Packaging; Safeco, administered by Liberty Mutual Insurance. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board found that the petition was untimely and dismissed it. The Board noted that the petition was filed more than 25 days after the service of the WCJ's March 4, 2015 decision and beyond whatever extension of time, if any, the petitioner might have been entitled to under WCAB Rule 10508.

Fibre Containers Company, dba Fleetwood Fibre and Packaging; Safeco, Administered by Liberty Mutual Insurance Ramiro Arteaga WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIA                RAMIRO ARTEAGA, Applicant,    vs.    FIBRE CONTAINERS COMPANY, dba FLEETWOOD FIBRE AND PACKAGING;SAFECO, administered by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, Defendants.        Case No. ADJ8135615                    ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the    report of the workers’ compensation administrativelaw judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our    review of the record, the petition is untimely and must be dismissed.     There are 25 days allowed within which to file a petition for reconsideration from a “final”    decision that has been served by mail upon an addressin California. (Lab. Code,§§ 5900(a), 5903; Cal.    Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10507(a)(l ).) This time limit is extended to the next business day if the last day for    filing falls on a weekend or holiday. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10508.) To be timely, however, a petition    for reconsideration must be filed with (i.e., received by) the WCAB within the time allowed; proof that    the petition was mailed (posted) within that period is insufficient. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, §§ 10845(a),10392(a).)     This time limit is jurisdictional and, therefore, the Appeals Board has no authority to consider or    act upon an untimely petition for reconsideration.(Maranian v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 81    Cal.App.4th 1068, 1076 (65 Cal.Comp.Cases 650, 656]; Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171,    1182; Scott v Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 979, 984 [46 Cal.Comp.Cases 1008,    1011]; US. Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Hinojoza) (1962) 201 Cal.App.2d 545, 549 (27    Cal.Comp.Cases 73, 75-76].) ,  The petition in this matter was filed on April 9, 2015:. This was more than 25 da

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.