Fleetwood Aluminum Products, Inc.; California Insurance Guarantee Association For Reliance Insurance, In Liquidation, Pete Soria WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAPETE SORIA, Applicant,vs.FLEETWOOD ALUMINUM PRODUCTS, INC.; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For RELIANCE INSURANCE, In Liquidation, Defendants.Case No. ADJ2765298OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION Defendant seeks reconsideration1 of a workers’ compensation administrative law judge’s (WCJ) Order of June 1, 2010. The Order was made at a lien conference on June 1, 2010 and is contained in the Minutes of Hearing of that lien conference. Although the written Order is not clearly legible, it appears to state, “Defendant [is] still not able to resolve or settle. Costs to be paid by [defendant] to lien [claimants] N-Care, JTru View Radiology], [Nations Capital Group] [and lien representative Pinnacle Lien Services in the amount of] $300.” The minutes of hearing do not contain any description of the evidence relied upon in making the order, nor is there any opinion on decision explaining the grounds for the decision. In this case, by way of a stipulated Award of February 11, 2009, it was found that, while employed as a truck driver/loader on April 15, 1999, applicant sustained industrial injury to his spine, left wrist, teeth, right shoulder, left temporomandibular joint, and to his laryngeal nerve, and in the forms of erectile dysfunction, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, and bruxism. Applicant’s injuries caused permanent total (100%) disability. Defendant contends that the WCJ erred in issuing the order for $300 in costs. We have not received an answer. Additionally, we do not have the benefit of the report contemplated by 1 The defendant stales in its petition that only “in the alternative” to reconsideration, it is seeking removal pursuant to Labor Code § 5310. The order imposing liability on the defendant is a f
Menu
