Noemi Mendoza vs. American Apparel; Srs

In this case, Noemi Mendoza is suing American Apparel for workers' compensation. Lien claimants, Metropolitan Health Medical Group, Kohanim Chiropractic, Rite Care Orthopedic Supply and "Marina Kuznetsova, LAc" sought reconsideration of the Notice of Intent to Issue Order of Disallowance, issued July 19, 2011, due to the non-appearance of petitioners at the lien trial. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as there was no final order which is subject to reconsideration at this time. The Board granted the Petition for Removal and rescinded the Notice of Intention to Disallow Lien, returning the matter to the

American Apparel; SRS Noemi Mendoza WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIANOEMI MENDOZA, Applicant,vs.AMERICAN APPAREL; SRS, Defendants.Case No. ADJ7219588OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING PETITION FOR REMOVAL AND DECISION AFTER REMOVAL            Lien claimants, Metropolitan Health Medical Group, Kohanim Chiropractic, Rite Care Orthopedic Supply and “Marina Kuznetsova, LAc”, seek reconsideration of the Notice of Intent to Issue Order of Disallowance, issued July 19, 2011, wherein the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) noted the non-appearance of petitioners at the lien trial and issued a Notice of Intention to disallow their claims “unless good cause be shown within 15 days” why the claims should not be dismissed. No order of dismissal was issued.            Petitioners contend that the WCJ erred by issuing the Notice of Intent to Issue Order of Disallowance (NIT) arguing: “On the morning of July 19, 2011 the representative assigned to appear at the trial was unable to appear due to illness. Notification of this inability to appear was communicated via email, requesting a continuance, to the W.C.A.B. at [email protected] as well as defense counsel at [email protected] upon learning of this situation.”            Upon receipt of petitioners’ Petition for Reconsideration, the WCJ issued an order pursuant to California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 10859 rescinding the NIT. However, as the WCJ noted in the Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report), “Due to an oversight the above referenced 10859 order was timely prepared by the Court but it was not signed, filed and served until 9/7/2011 .” Therefore, the rescission of the NIT was beyond the 15 day period set forth in California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 10859 for rescission of an order. ,             Based upon our review of the record, and for the reasons set forth herein, we will dismiss lien claiman

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.