Jackson Creek Dental Group; Zenith Insurance Company Monica Garretson WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMONICA GARRETSON, Applicant,vs.JACKSON CREEK DENTAL GROUP;ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.Case No. ADJ2896668 (OAK 0224622)ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REMOVAL We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the Report authored by Cristine E. Gondak, the workers’ compensation administrative law judge, with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said Report, which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny removal. Furthermore, we see no significant prejudice or irreparable harm in WCJ Shields having consulted the Presiding WCJ and referring the petition to the WCJ assigned for trial./ / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / / , For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Removal be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_________________________________________DEIDRA E. LOWEI CONCUR,_________________________________________FRANK M. BRASS_________________________________________ALFONSO J. MORESIDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAMAY 08 2013SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.CHERNOW LIEBOD LEGAL OAKLANDPOMPER DETTENHAIMSIBTFZENITH INSURANCEsye , WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDDIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATIONSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMONICA GARRETSON-MILLERv.JACKSON CREEK DENTAL GROUP and ZENITHINSURANCE COMPANY WCAB CASE NO.: ADJ2896668JUDGE STANLEY E. SHIELDSREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITION FOR REMOVAL1ISSUE PRESENTED[justify] Whether Defendant is irreparably harmed or significantly[/justify][justify] prejudiced by the Judge’s Minute Order, executed pursuant[/justify][justify] to the direction of the Oakland District Office Presiding[/justify][just
