Mohamed Moneeb Elnabarawy vs. Taco Bell; Ace American Insurance,

.SFO 0496825In this case, Taco Bell and Ace American Insurance appealed a decision by a workers' compensation administrative law judge that found that Mohamed Moneeb Elnabarawy, an employee of Taco Bell, had sustained an industrial psychiatric injury. The appeals board granted reconsideration, rescinded the decision, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ. The appeals board found that the WCJ should not have relied on the opinion of the panel qualified medical evaluator (QME) as it was not formally admitted into evidence and violated basic principles of due process. The appeals board ordered that the QME's report be formally admitted and that the WCJ conduct a new trial

Taco Bell; Ace American Insurance, Mohamed Moneeb Elnabarawy WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMOHAMED MONEER ELNABARAWY, Applicant,vs.TACO BELL; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ2553755 (SFO 0496825)OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            Defendant seeks reconsideration of the September 9, 2010 Findings oJ fact issued by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) wherein the WCJ I wind tliat applicant, while employed as a senior assistant general manager during the cumulative period ending February 20. 2006. sustained industrial psychiatric injury. The WCJ further found that defendant failed to prose a good faith pcisonal action defense. All oilier issues were deferred.            Defendant contends that the WCJ should not have relied on the opinion of panel qualified medical evaluator (QME) Alberto Lopez. M.D.. to find industrial psychiatric injury arguing that Dr. Lopez’ May 24. 2010 report was not listed as an exhibit on the pretrial conlerence statement, that it was not admitted into evidence at trial, and that it docs not consist ol substantial medical evidence.            Applicant filed an Answer, and the WCJ issued a Report and Recommendation on Petiiion for Reconsideration i Repon) recommending that we deny reconsideration            Based on our icsicw of the record and for the reasons discussed below, we will grant reconsideration, rescind die WCJ’s decision, and return this matter to the trial lecl for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ.            This matter wax tried on July 21. 2010. At that time. Dr Lope/’ May 24. 2010 panel QMF. report was not formally received into evidence but was only marked for identification. , Nevertheless, lhe WO relied on Dr. Lopez’ opinion lo find industrial psychiatric injury. In her Report, the WCJ Mated that. “The fact that I relied on the report of PQME Dr. Lopez in making my decision would imply that the d

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.