COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Permissibly Self-Insured, MICHAEL BROOKS, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMICHAEL BROOKS, Applicant,vs.COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Permissibly Self-Insured, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ1898181 (SAC 0367383)OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION Defendant seeks reconsideration of the August 4, 2009 Findings and Award issued by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) wherein the WCJ found that applicant, while employed as a probation officer during the period through December 14, 2007, sustained industrial psychiatric injury causing 15% permanent disability and need for further medical treatment. Defendant contends that the WCJ erred in finding that applicant sustained industrial psychiatric injury. Defendant argues that the WCJ’s decision is not supported by substantial medical evidence, that applicant’s claim is a result of lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions, that applicant is not a credible witness, and that defendant has newly discovered evidence in the form of a supplemental medical report dated August 3, 2009 from agreed medical examiner (AME) Ann Allen, M.D., which supports a finding of no industrial injury. Applicant filed an Answer and the WCJ issued a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report) recommending that we deny reconsideration. Based on our review of the record and for the reasons discussed below, we will grant reconsideration, rescind the WCJ’s decision, and return this matter to the trial level for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ. , RELEVANT FACTS Applicant claims industrial psychiatric injury as a result of cumulative trauma through December 14, 2007 while employed as a supervising probation officer at a juvenile correction facility. Defendant denied liability asserting that applicant’s claim was barred by Labor Code’ section 3208.3 (lawful, non
Michael Brooks, vs. County Of Sacramento, Permissibly Self-insured,
In this case, the County of Sacramento was seeking reconsideration of a decision by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board that found that an applicant, Michael Brooks, had sustained an industrial psychiatric injury while employed as a probation officer. The County argued that the decision was not supported by substantial medical evidence, that the applicant's claim was a result of lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions, and that the County had newly discovered evidence in the form of a supplemental medical report. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the decision, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ. The Board outlined a multilevel analysis to be used when a psychiatric injury is alleged and the defense of a lawful,
- Filed On:
- Court: California, Sacramento
- Case No. ADJ1898181
To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days
Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!
Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.