THE KROGER COMPANY, dba RALPHS; Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK MARITZA MOLINA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMARITZA MOLINA, Applicant,vs.THE KROGER COMPANY, dba RALPHS; Permissibly Self-Insured,Administered By SEDGWICK, Defendants.Case Nos. ADJ1972670 (LAO 0780520)ADJ1994294 (MON 0294825)ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, the petition is untimely and must be dismissed. There are 25 days allowed within which to file a petition for reconsideration from a “final” decision that has been served by mail upon an address in California. (Lab. Code, §§ 5900(a), 5903; Cal. Code Regs, tit. 8, § 10507(a)(1).). This time limit is extended to the next business day if the last day for filing falls on a weekend or holiday. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10508.) To be timely, however, a petition for reconsideration must be filed with (i.e., received by) the WCAB within the time allowed; proof that the petition was mailed (posted) within that period is insufficient. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, §§ 10845(a), 10392(a).) This time limit is jurisdictional and, therefore, the Appeals Board has no authority to consider or act upon an untimely petition for reconsideration. (Maranian v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 81 Cal. App.4th 1068, 1076 [65 Cal.Comp.Cases 650, 656]; Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171, 1182; Scott v Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 122 Cal. App.3d 979, 984 [46 Cal.Comp.Cases 1008, 1011]; U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Hinojoza) (1962) 201 Cal.App.2d 545, 549 [27 Cal.Comp Cases 73, 75-761.)/ / / , The petition in this matter was filed on May 12, 2016. This was more than 25 days after the service of the WCJ’s April 5, 2016 decision
