Maria Sanchez vs. Angelo & Marie Laparulo; Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, Administered By Liberty mutual/helmsman Management services, Inc.

This case involves Maria Sanchez, who is seeking reconsideration of a Joint Findings and Order issued by a workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on September 8, 2010. The WCJ found that Sanchez did not present sufficient evidence to sustain findings that her alleged injuries arose out of and occurred in the course of her employment. The WCJ ordered that Sanchez take nothing. In Case Number ADJ131017 (LAO 0815948), the WCJ issued a September 8, 2010 Findings and Award finding that Sanchez sustained industrial injury to her back, shoulders and knees while working as a housekeeper during the period from 1985 through October 9, 1998, which resulted in 44 percent permanent disability and a need for further medical treatment

Angelo & Marie Laparulo; Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, Administered By Liberty Mutual/Helmsman Management Services, Inc. Maria Sanchez WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMARIA SANCHEZ, Applicant,vs.ANGELO & MARIE LAPARULO; USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Adminislered By LIBERTY MUTUAL/HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendants.Case No. ADJ131017 (LAO 0815948); ADJ1039868 (LAO 0870358)OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION`            Applicant, in propria persona, seeks reconsideration of the Joint Findings and Order issued by a workers* compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on September 8, 2010, in Case Numbers ADJ1039868 (LAO 0870358) (date of injury 10/20/93, alleged injury—the Electronic Adjudication Management System (LAMS) notes that there is “insufficient information to identify body parts“). A DJ 1151051 (I AO 0851056) (date of injury—I/I3/98, alleged injury- head. face, upper extremities and knees and leg). ADJ 1221695 (LAO 0851051) (date of injury— 10/13/98, alleged injury—LAMS notes that there is “insufficient information to identify body pans’*), ADJ2892929 (LAO 0851057) (date of injury—4/12/85, alleged injury—face, mouth), ADJ3951418 (LAO 0851054) (date of injury—6/8/94, alleged injury—head, face, upper extremities, knee, and leg), ADJ4026047 (LAO 0851053) (date of injury—defendant’ ! 2/94, alleged injury- digestive system), ADJ4055891 (LAO 0870357) (date of injury—4/15/92. alleged injury—head. arm. back, chest and multiple pans). ADJ4482258 (LAO 0851055) (date of injury—2/20/93, alleged injury’—digestive system), and ADJ4706034 (LAO 0851052) (date of , injury—7/30/98, alleged injury—CAMS noies that there is “insufficient information to identify body parts’*). In that decision, the WCJ found that applicant did not present sufficient evidence to sustain findings that her alleged injuries arose out of and occurred in the course of her employment. The WCJ ordered that applicant take nothing. In Case N

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.