Maria Campos, vs. Cola/martin Luther King Hospital #125 C/o Tristar Risk Management,

(LAO 0859849) is a case involving Maria Campos and Cola/Martin Luther King Hospital #125 c/o Tristar Risk Management. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and amended the Amended Findings and Award of August 20, 2009 to include the permanent and stationary date as February 2, 2007 and to defer the calculation of the permanent disability indemnity award, attorney's fees, and commutation pending further proceedings and new determination by the WCJ.

COLA/MARTIN LUTHER KING HOSPITAL #125 c/o TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, MARIA CAMPOS, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMARIA CAMPOS, Applicant,vs.COLA/MARTIN LUTHER KING HOSPITAL #125 c/o TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ288780 (LAO 0859849)OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            Defendant seeks reconsideration of Amended Findings and Award of August 20, 2009, in which the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found that applicant became permanent and stationary (P & S) on February 9, 2009, that applicant is 100% permanently disabled without apportionment “at a weekly rate of $487.05 for life after the side end commutation for attorney’s fees, with upward adjustments annually pursuant to Labor Code section 4659(c),” and that applicant’s attorney is entitled to “a reasonable attorney’s fee to be commuted from the side end of the award [of] $247,197.00.”            Defendant contends, in substance, that the P & S date of February 9, 2009 is clerical error, that the WCJ erred in finding no apportionment, that the attorney’s fee is excessive and lacks specificity, and that the WCJ erred in not developing the record.            Applicant filed an answer.            In reference to the WCJ’s finding of 100% permanent disability without apportionment, we have considered the allegations of defendant’s Petition for Reconsideration and the Report and Recommendation of the WCJ with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said Report, which we adopt and incorporate on the issue of permanent disability without apportionment, we will affirm the WCJ’s finding on this issue. ,             However, the WCJ’s Report does not respond to defendant’s contention that there is clerical error in the P & S date of February 9, 2009. On this issue, the WCJ stated as follows in his Opinion on Decision:            “Based upon a review of the record to include the AME report

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.