Adecco Staffing And Insurance Company Of The State Of Pennsylvania Marco De Anda WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAMARCO DE ANDA, Applicant,vs.ADECCO STAFFING AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ1392547OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AND DISMISSING PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION Applicant, representing himself, seeks reconsideration of the May 18, 2010 Findings and Award, in which the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) found that applicant, while employed as a forklift operator on or about January 14, 2002, sustained industrial injury to his back, neck, and psyche, causing temporär}’ total disability for broken periods beginning June 26 2002, through August 20, 2007, for which applicant has been fully compensated, 50 percent permanent disability with no apportionment, and need of further medical treatment. Applicant contends that he should be found temporarily totally disabled for the period September 11,2007, to May 15, 2009. We have considered the Petition for Reconsideration and defendant’s Answer, and we have reviewed the record in this matter. The WCJ prepared a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report), recommending that the petition be denied. For the reasons expressed by the WCJ in her Report, which we adopt and incorporate, and for the reasons discussed below, we will deny applicant’s petition for reconsideration, to the extent it seeks reconsideration of the May 18, 2010 Findings and Award, and dismiss the petition for reconsideration, to the extent it seeks reconsideration of the October 12, 2007 order granting defendant’s Petition to Terminate Liability for Temporary Disability Indemnity. , Initially, in addition to other irregularities, applicant’s petition is not verified, as required by tabor Code section 5902. Failure to verity a petition for reconsideration is not a jurisdictional defect which m
Menu
