Barrett Business Services Loreto Ramirez WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIALORETO RAMIREZ, Applicant,vs.BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, Defendant.Case No. ADJ8019724 (Santa Ana District Office)ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration. Furthermore, the WCJ’s decision is consistent with Figueroa v. B.C. Doering Co. (2013) Cal. Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 64 (78 Cal.Comp.Cases –) [Appeals Board En Banc]./ / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / / , For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Reconsideration be, and it hereby is, DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_________________________________________ALFONSO J. MORESII CONCUR,_________________________________________ MARGUERITE SWEENEY_________________________________________ FRANK M. BRASSDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAJUN 07 2013SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.HEGGENESS SWEETMED LEGALjp , STATE OF CALIFORNIADivision of Workers’ CompensationWorkers’ Compensation Appeals BoardCASE NUMBER: ADJ8019724LORETO RAMIREZ-vs.-BBSI; CORVEL SACRAMENTO;MED-LEGAL PHOTOCOPY, Real Party in InterestWORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:Norman F. DelaterreDATE: May 9, 2013REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATIONIntroduction On March 19, 2013 the above referenced case was set for a lien conference was held before the undersigned Presiding Workers’ Compensation Administrative Law Judge. Lien claimant Med-Legal Photocopy was present through thei
Loreto Ramirez vs. Barrett Business Services
is a case in which the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a Petition for Reconsideration filed by lien claimant Med-Legal Photocopy. The Petition was denied due to Med-Legal Photocopy's failure to pay a lien activation fee as required by Labor Code § 4903.06(a). The decision was consistent with Figueroa v. B.C. Doering Co. (2013) Cal. Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 64 (78 Cal.Comp.Cases --).
- Filed On:
- Court: California, Santa Ana
- Case No. ADJ8019724
To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days
Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!
Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.