Freeman Motors; St. Paul/Travelers Insurance Company; Dan Mottaz Video; State Compensation Insurance Fund; Macerich Company; Chubb Services Corporation Kevin Jannelle WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAKEVIN JANNELLE, Applicant,vs.FREEMAN MOTORS; ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY; DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO; STATECOMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; MACERICH COMPANY; CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants.Case Nos. ADJ3106373 (SRO 0136132); ADJ3762980 (SRO 0129707); ADJ642079 (SRO 094945); ADJ3252691 (SRO 094944); ADJ3202994 (SRO 090481)OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION Defendants Macerich Company and Chubb Services Corporation (Petitioners) seekreconsideration of our earlier October 1, 2010 Opinion and Order Granting Reconsideration andDecision After Reconsideration (Decision) wherein we granted the petition of Freeman Toyota(Freeman) and its insurance carrier St. Paul/Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) forreconsideration of the July 9, 2010 Joint Findings and Orders of the workers’ compensationadministrative law judge (WCJ) who found in pertinent part that Travelers’ claims for contributionand/or reimbursement in SRO 0129707 and SRO 0136132 “were not timely filed.” Based on thatfinding the WCJ ordered that Travelers take nothing by way of its petition for contribution and/orreimbursement. In our October 1. 2010 Decision, we rescinded the WCJ’s July 9, 2010 Joint Findings and Orders because wc concluded that Travelers did timely institute proceedings to obtain contribution and/or reimbursement from the other defendants as described in Labor Code section 5500.5 when , it filed a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed on those issues on January 20. 2009.1 The case was remanded for ¿j-bit™”011 of Travelers’ claims for contribution and/or reimbursement and for a decision on those issues and on the statute of limitat ions defense raised by the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) in SRO 0136132. The fiv
