Karin White vs. City Of Pasadena, Permissibly Self-insured

In this case, the City of Pasadena was found to have permissibly self-insured Karin White, an employee who sustained industrial injury to her heart, gastrointestinal system and in the form of hypertension. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, and amended the Findings and Award of May 10, 2012 to reflect that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury to her gastrointestinal system, and to reflect that she is entitled to permanent disability indemnity in the total amount of $49,450. The attorney's fee was not increased.

CITY OF PASADENA, permissibly Self-Insured KARIN WHITE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAKARIN WHITE, Applicant,vs.CITY OF PASADENA, permissibly Self-Insured, Defendant.Case No. ADJ4551658(Marina del Rey District Office)OPINION AND ORDER DENYING APPLICANT’S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION,GRANTING DEFENDANT’S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DECISIONAFTER RECONSIDERATION            Applicant and defendant each seek reconsideration of a workers’ compensation administrative law judge’s Findings and Award of May 10, 2012, wherein it was found that, while employed as a police officer during a cumulative period ending on June 23, 2006, applicant sustained industrial injury to her heart, gastrointestinal system and in the form of hypertension, but not to her psyche or in the form of multiple sclerosis. The WCJ found that the applicant’s injury caused permanent disability of 42% and the need for further medical treatment. In finding permanent disability of 42%, the WCJ apportioned 60% of the applicant’s hypertension disability to industrial causes. Although the WCJ found industrial injury to the gastrointestinal system, in the Opinion on Decision, the WCJ stated that he accepted a medical opinion that applicant’s gastrointestinal problems were “non-industrial and fully treatable.” Additionally, in finding permanent disability of 42%, the WCJ did not find any gastrointestinal permanent disability.            Applicant contends that the WCJ erred in finding that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury to the psyche or in the form of multiple sclerosis. Defendant contends that the WCJ erred in (1) finding industrial injury to the gastrointestinal system and in (2) finding industrial injury in the form of hypertension. Alternatively, the defendant contends that the WCJ erred in apportioning 60% of applicant’s hypertension disability to industrial causes. Defendant has filed an answer to the applicant’s , petition and the WCJ has filed two separate R

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.