John Vlcek, vs. The Home Depot, Permissibly Self-insured,

(SJO 0267873)In this case, John Vlcek, an employee of The Home Depot, was granted reconsideration of the Findings and Award of September 26, 2008, to further study the issues in the case. The case was returned to the trial level to allow the WCJ and parties an opportunity to consider and apply the Appeals Board's recent en banc decisions in Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco and Almaraz v. Environmental Recovery Services. The WCJ shall conduct further proceedings, as necessary, and issue a new decision applying the correct methods of determining whether and how the DFEC portion or the AMA Guides portion of the 2005 Schedule is rebutted. The issue of the

THE HOME DEPOT, permissibly self-insured, JOHN VLCEK, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJOHN VLCEK, Applicant,vs.THE HOME DEPOT, permissibly self-insured, Defendant.Case No. ADJ1932557 (SJO 0267873)OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            On December 8, 2008, we granted reconsideration of the Findings and Award of September 26, 2008, to further study the issues in this case. This is our Decision After Reconsideration.            In relevant part of the September 26, 2008 Findings and Award, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found that applicant sustained an admitted industrial injury to his left knee on December 16, 2006, while employed by defendant as a supervisor, and that the injury caused, among other things, a need for further medical treatment and 4% permanent disability, determined pursuant to the 2005 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities (2005 Schedule), entitling applicant to further medical treatment and permanent disability indemnity totaling $2,760.            In his petition for reconsideration, applicant ostensibly contended that the injury caused more than 4% permanent disability, arguing, circuitously, that the WCJ should have followed the opinion of applicant’s vocational expert regarding applicant’s diminished future earning capacity (DFEC) caused by the injury.            Defendant filed an answer to the petition for reconsideration.I.            We have considered the allegations made in the petition for reconsideration and answer thereto, as well as the content of the WCJ’s Report and Recommendation.            Based on our review of the record and for the reasons explained below, as our Decision After Reconsideration, we will amend the Findings and Award of September 26, 2008, to defer the , issue of the extent of permanent disability caused by the injury, as well as the interrelated issues of applicant’s attorneys’ fee and the lien claim of Employment Development Department, and return this matter

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.