Jeannette Rodriguez Case Against Department Of Industrial Relations

, 0146447 , 0329311In this case, Jeannette Rodriguez, an employee of the Department of Industrial Relations, was injured in six separate incidents while on the job. The parties stipulated that the injuries caused 36% permanent disability, payable at $187.00 per week beginning January 3, 2006, in the sum of $32,351.00. Rodriguez sought reconsideration of the October 29, 2007 Award, claiming that body parts were crossed off and/or altered on the Stipulations With Request for Award, that the amount of permanent disability indemnity was not correct for a finding of 36 percent permanent disability, and that the claims administrator failed to correct/amend the Stipulations With Request for Award, as requested

Department Of Industrial Relations; State Compensation Insurance Fund Jeannette Rodriguez WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJeannette Rodriguez, Applicant,vs.Department Of Industrial Relations; State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants.Case No. AHM 0124082 AHM 0124083AHM 0124085 AHM 0146447AHM 0146449 SBR 0329311OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION            Applicant, in propria persona, seeks reconsideration of the October 29, 2007 Award, wherein the workers’ compensation administrative Jaw judge (“WCT) approved the parties’ Stipulations With Request for Award. The parties stipulated that applicant, while employed as a workers’ compensation rehabilitation consultant on ”A) 05/24/04,” ”B) 04/05/04,” “C) CT 03/16/05,” ”D) 06/28/05,” *‘E) 12/08/06,” and “F) 09/07/04,” sustained industrial injury to her “A) Knees, hands, left foot, leg, back, arms B) & C) left arm, shoulders, neck, lumbar D) knees and lumbar E) Right Thumb,” causing no temporary disability and causing permanent disability of 36 percent, payable at $187.00 per week beginning January 3, 2006, in the sum of $32,351.00. The Stipulations stated that the permanent disability rate was decreased pursuant to Labor Code section 4658(d).Applicant contends that body pans were crossed off and/or altered on the Stipulations With Request for Award, that the amount of permanent disability indemnity is not correct for a finding of 36 percent permanent disability, that Labor Code section 4658(d) does not apply because defendant failed to offer her regular, modified, or alternative work, that the stipulations incoiTectly state the amount of permanent disability advances received, and that the claims administrator failed , to correct/amend the Stipulations With Request for Award, as requested by applicant.            We have considered the Petition for Reconsideration, and we have reviewed the record inthis matter. We have not received an Answer from def

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.