Jay Cellini, vs. Robert Half International; Chartis San Ramon,

is a case in which the applicant, Jay Cellini, sought reconsideration of a Stipulated Award of September 15, 2009. The award found that while employed as a legal secretary on December 11, 2007, he sustained industrial injury to his bilateral upper extremities, including his fingers, hand, wrist, and arm, causing temporary disability from January 12, 2008 to January 28, 2008 and from June 30, 2008 to July 13, 2008, and the need for further medical treatment, but causing no compensable (0%) permanent disability. The petition for reconsideration was accepted as timely, but denied on the merits because the applicant had misconstrued the medical evaluator's report, which found no ratable permanent disability under the applicable 2005

ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL; CHARTIS SAN RAMON, JAY CELLINI, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAJAY CELLINI, Applicant,vs.ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL;CHARTIS SAN RAMON, Defendants.Case No. ADJ6791682OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FORRECONSIDERATION            Applicant, who is representing himself, seeks reconsideration of a Stipulated Award of September 15, 2009 wherein it was found that while employed as a legal secretary on December 11, 2007, he sustained industrial injury to his bilateral upper extremities, including his fingers, hand, wrist, and arm, causing temporary disability from January 12, 2008 to January 28, 2008 and from June 30, 2008 to July 13, 2008, and the need for further medical treatment, but causing no compensable (0%) permanent disability.       Applicant’s Petition for Reconsideration reads as follows:       “I request the Court invoke its discretion and grant this Petition.       This Petition is filed after the 20 day period. The reason for the       late filing is that I am the primary and sole caretaker of my 90 year-       old mother who suffered a stroke in May of 2009. Additionally, I       have been under the impression that the Award was to based (sic)       on the findings of Dr. Markison in the Stipulation awarding       Applicant a 10% disability rating. Today while I was reviewing       the Award I noticed that someone entered a “0” [percent]       permanent disability rating, contradicting Dr. Markison’s       findings.”            Subsequently, the applicant filed an Amended/Supplemental Petition for Reconsideration which read as follows:       “At the end of April 2009, I was laid-off from my job.       In mid-May 2009, my mother suffered a stroke leaving her unable       to swallow among other things. After two weeks in the ICU and       six weeks of rehabilitation my mother was released in my custody ,        on July 8, 2009. I agreed to be her caregiver to get her out of the       rehabilitation hospita

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.