Helen Pena vs. Securitas Security; Broadspire Insurance,

Helen Pena v. Securitas Security and Broadspire Insurance was a case in which the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed due to it not being verified in violation of Labor Code section 5902. Had the petition been verified, it would have been denied on the merits.

SECURITAS SECURITY; BROADSPIRE INSURANCE, Helen Pena WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAHELEN PENA,Applicant,vs.SECURITAS SECURITY; BROADSPIREINSURANCE, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ549943 (VNO 0516779)ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FORRECONSIDERATION  We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents ofthe Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). Based on our review of the record, we note that the petition is not verified in violation of Labor Code section 5902. Therefore, we will dismiss it. (Smith v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2001) 66 Cal.Comp.Cases 788, writ denied.) Furthermore, had the petition been verified, for the reasons stated by the WCJ in the Reportand Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration, wlhicn we adopt and incorporate, we would deny on the merits. ,  For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Reconsideration is DISMISSED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_______________________________________RICK DIETRICHI CONCUR,_______________________________________JAMES C. CUNEO_______________________________________ALFONSO J, MORESIDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAOCT 11 2010SERVICE MADE BY MAIL ON ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES AS SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD:MANAGEMED, INC. DIETZ, GILMORE & ASSOCIATESebc ADJ549943

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.