SPEDIA.COM INC. AND SYSMASTER CORP.; GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY HAMID KHAZAELI WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAHAMID KHAZAELI, Applicant,vs.SPEDIA.COM INC. AND SYSMASTER CORP.; GREATAMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.Case Nos. ADJ460672 (SFO 0499592)ADJ1224818 (SFO 0499593)(Oakland District Office)OPINION AND ORDERS DENYING PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION,REMOVAL, DISCOVERY AND DISQUALIFICATIONS Applicant, in pro per, has filed two petitions that are now before the Appeals Board. The first filed on or about August 21, 2012, is captioned “Petitions for Reconsideration, Removal, Disqualifications, and to Compel Testimony Of Judicial Or Quasi-Judicial Officers” (Petition One).1 The second filed on or about September 11, 2012, is captioned “Petitions for Removal, Disqualification And To Compel Testimony Of Judicial Or Quasi-Judicial Officers” (Petition Two).2 Petition One challenges the July 20, 2012 Order Dismissing Claims And Order Sanctioning Applicant (Order) of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge, who ordered that petitioner’s “applications for adjudication of claim in ADJ1224818 (SF0499593) and ADJ460672 (SF0499592) are dismissed with prejudice,” and further ordered petitioner to pay two $500 sanctions and defendant’s reasonable attorney fees and costs for missing two court dates without good cause. It appears Petition Two was filed by applicant in response to the WCJ’s initial report that Petition One was untimely filed. However, it was subsequently learned after the WCJ filed his initial report that applicant had earlier filed the same petition at another, albeit incorrect District Office, but within the allowed time. (Lab. Code, § 5903.) We accept Petition One as timely filed. 1 Quotations converted from upper case where applicable.2 Applicant was earlier declared to be a vexatious litigant, and his two petitions are approved for filing. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10782.) ,
