Guillermo Echavarria vs. Bathtub King; Everest National Insurance Company

is a case involving Guillermo Echavarria, applicant, and Bathtub King and Everest National Insurance Company, defendants. Lien claimants One Stop Multi-Specialty Medical Group, Inc., Arash Yaghoobian, M.D., Imperial Medical Management, Justin Paquette, M.D., Sunrise Diagnostics, Pain Relief Acupuncture Group, Michael Rudolph, M.D., and Myelin Diagnostics jointly requested reconsideration of the October 8, 2013 Findings Of Fact and Order of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) who found that applicant did not sustain a compensable industrial injury while employed by defendant employer Bathtub King during the period January 1, 2001 through August 8, 2011, and

BATHTUB KING; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY GUILLERMO ECHAVARRIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAGUILLERMO ECHAVARRIA, Applicant,vs.BATHTUB KING; EVEREST NATIONALINSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants,ONE STOP MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICALGROUP, INC.; ARASH YAGHOOBIAN, M.D.;IMPERIAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT;JUSTIN PAQUETTE, M.D.; SUNRISEDIAGNOSTICS; PAIN RELIEFACUPUNCTURE GROUP; MICHAELRUDOLPH, M.D.; MYELIN DIAGNOSTICS, Lien Claimants.Case No. ADJ8024184(Long Beach District Office)OPINION AND ORDERDENYING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION            In a single pleading captioned “Lien Claimants’ Petition For Removal In Accord With L.C. §5903,” lien claimants One Stop Multi-Specialty Medical Group, Inc., Arash Yaghoobian, M.D., Imperial Medical Management, Justin Paquette, M.D., Sunrise Diagnostics, Pain Relief Acupuncture Group, Michael Rudolph, M.D., and Myelin Diagnostics (Lien Claimants) jointly request reconsideration of the October 8, 2013 Findings Of Fact and Order of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) who found that applicant did not sustain compensable industrial injury while employed by defendant employer Bathtub King during the period January 1, 2001 through August 8, 2011, and disallowed each of their individual lien claims.            Lien Claimants contend that the weight of the evidence supports a finding of compensable industrial injury and that the WCJ improperly applied the post-termination defense described in/ / // / / , Labor Code section 3600(a)(10)(D) to disallow their liens claims.1            An answer was not received. The WCJ provided a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report) recommending that reconsideration be denied.            We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the allegations of Lien Claimants’ petition and the WCJ’s Report with respect thereto. For the reasons stated by the WCJ in his Report, which are incorporated by reference except as noted below, and for the

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.