Florian Mihele, vs. Healthpointe Medical Group; Security National Insurance Company Administered By Amtrust North America,

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by Florian Mihele against Healthpointe Medical Group and Security National Insurance Company administered by Amtrust North America. The petition was found to be untimely and was dismissed by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The decision was based on the fact that the petition was not filed within the 25 day time limit allowed for filing a petition for reconsideration from a "final" decision that has been served by mail upon an address in California.

Healthpointe Medical Group; Security National Insurance Company administered by Amtrust North America, Florian Mihele, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAFLORIAN MIHELE,Applicant,vs.HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL GROUP; SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY administered by AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA,Defendants.Case No. ADJ10221419(Pomona District Office)OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION            We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, the petition is untimely and must be dismissed.            There are 25 days allowed within which to file .a petition for reconsideration from a “final” decision that has been served by mail upon an address in California. (Lab. Code,§§ 5900(a), 5903; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10507(a)(l).) This time limit is extended to the next business day if the last day for filing falls on a weekend or holiday. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10508.) To be timely, however, a petition for reconsideration must be filed with (i.e., received by) the WCAB within the time allowed; proof that the petition was mailed (posted) within that period is insufficient. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, §§ 10845(a), 10392(a).)            This time limit is jurisdictional and, therefore, the Appeals Board has no authority to consider or act upon an untimely petition for reconsideration. (Maranian v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1076 [65 Cal.Comp.Cases.650, 656]; Rymer v. Hagler (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1171, 1182; Scott v Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 979, 984 [46 Cal.Comp.Cases 1008, 1011]; US. Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Hinojoza) (1962) 201 Cal.App.2d 545, 549 [27 Cal.Comp.Cases 73, 75-76].) ,             The WCJ issued the decision in this matter on November 30, 2016. Based on the authority cited above, defend

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.