Golden Gate Bridge, Highway And Transportation District, Adjusted By Athens Administrators Elena Almazan WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAELENA ALMAZAN, Applicant,vs.GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Adjusted By ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS, Defendant(s).Case No.: ADJ4139911; ADJ2615875; ADJ1560333; ADJ3261818OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING REMOVALDefendant seeks reconsideration of the Findings and Orders issued by a workers’ ! compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on June 16, 2010. In that decision, the WCJ found that the exhibits of lien claimant Vatche Cubayan Medical Corporation (hereafter “lien claimant”) | numbered I through 5 and 7 through 10 were admissible, and that lien claimant’s Exhibits 11 and 12 were not admissible. The WCJ further found that the record was in need of further development ¡ to be able to determine lien claimant’s right, if any, to recover. The underlying claim in this matter involves industrial injuries to applicant’s right shoulder, right thumb, bilateial upper extremities, bilateral lower extremities, back and neck on February 9, 1997 (WCK 0039953); on September 30, 1997 (WCK 0039954); on May 15, 1998 (WCK 0055867); and on April 7, 2000 (WCK 0055868), while working as a bridge officer. Applicant and defendant resolved these claim!» by way of an Award based on the parties’ stipulations, which issued on May 12, 2003. In its Petition for Reconsideration, defendant contends that the WCJ erred in admitting lien claimant’s exhibits where defendant’s witness testified that there were payments made to lien , claimant which were unacknowledged and where defendant challenged lien claimant’s exhibits on the grounds of accuracy and adequacy. Defendant argues that Court Administrator Rule 10236 : , (Cal. Code Regs., lit. 8, § 10236. effective 11/17/2008) applies here and lhai because lien claimant did not establish that the documents arc accurate rep
