Safeway, Inc., Permissibly Self-Insured Diana Burke WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIADIANA BURKE, Applicant,vs.SAFEWAY, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ6978404ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration. , For the foregoing reasons,IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Reconsideration be, and it hereby is, DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD________________________________________JAMES C. CUNEOI CONCUR,_________________________________________ALFONSO J. MORESI_________________________________________FRANK M. BRASSDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIAJUNE 08 2010SERVICE MADE BY MAIL ON ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES AS SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD:DIANA BURKEFERCHLAND LAW OFFICEBOEHM & ASSOCIATESMULLEN & FILIPPIcsl ADJ6978404
Diana Burke vs. Safeway, Inc., Permissibly Self-insured
is a case in which the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Diana Burke's Petition for Reconsideration against Safeway, Inc., who was permissibly self-insured. The Board adopted and incorporated the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge and denied the Petition for Reconsideration. The decision was dated and filed at San Francisco, California on June 8, 2010 and service was made by mail on the same date.
- Filed On:
- Court: California, San Francisco
- Case No. ADJ6978404
To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days
Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!
Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.