Dawn May vs. West Valley/Mission College; California Insurance Guarantee Association For Fremont Compensation Insurance In Liquidation; Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund

In this case, the applicant, Dawn May, sought reconsideration of the February 18, 2010 Findings and Order of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) who found that she had not filed her application for Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) benefits within a reasonable time. The WCJ's decision was overturned and the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings. The Supreme Court's decision in Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Talcott) (1970) 2 Cal.3d 56 [35 Cal.Comp.Cases 80] was used to determine that the applicant had filed her claim for SIBTF benefits within a reasonable time.

West Valley/Mission College; California Insurance Guarantee Association for Fremont Compensation Insurance in liquidation; Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund Dawn May WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIADAWN MAY, Applicant,vs.WEST VALLEY/MISSION COLLEGE; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEEASSOCIATION for FREMONT COMPENSATION INSURANCE in liquidation; SUBSEQUENT INJURIESBENEFITS TRUST FUND, Defendants.Case No. ADJ4219530 (SJO 0221066)OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISIONAFTER RECONSIDERATION            Applicant seeks reconsideration of the February 18, 2010 Findings and Order of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) who found that applicant sustained industrial injury to her spine on October 22, 1998 while employed as a financial aid tech by West Valley/Mission College and that she “knew or should have known that she suffered from a pre-existing disability upon receipt of Dr. [Frederick] Newton’s report of 11/25/02,” that she “knew or should have known that a substantial likelihood existed of SIBTF [Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund or “Fund”] liability by no later than 7/22/04,” and that she “did not file her Application for SIBTF benefits until 12/10/08,” which was not ‘”within a reasonable time’ from 7/22/04.” Based upon those findings, the WCJ ordered that applicant take nothing on her claim for SIBTF benefits.            Earlier, on March 26, 2009, the WCJ approved the compromise and release agreement between applicant and defendant that settled her claim of specific industrial injury to her back and , psyche with a lump sum payment of $329,105.            Applicant contends that the WCJ erred in finding that her application for SIBTF benefits is barred because it was untimely filed.            An answer was received from the SIBTF, and the WCJ provided a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report). Applicant requested to file a Response to the WCJ’s Report as allowed by Cali

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.