San Francisco Bay Area Transit District, Permissibly Self-Insured Clifford Mims WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIACLIFFORD MIMS, Applicant,vs.SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA TRANSIT DISTRICT, Permissibly Self-Insured, Defendants.Case No. ADJ6478466(Stockton District Office)OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REMOVAL Applicant’s attorney of record, Central Valley Injured Worker Legal Clinic Inc., seeks reconsideration and removal of the Findings and Award issued October 17, 2012, wherein the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) found that good cause existed to reopen applicant’s claim and reduce applicant’s disability award to 28% permanent partial disability. All other issues regarding Labor Code sections 5814 and 5814.5 were deferred. The issue of any modification to attorney fees was also expressly deferred. In a petition seeking reconsideration and removal, Central Valley Injured Worker Legal Clinic Inc., contends that the WCJ erred by ordering Central Valley Injured Worker Legal Clinic, Inc. to reimburse applicant for excess attorney fees as a result of the reduction of attorney fees from 15% to 12% and the reduction to 28% permanent partial disability. Central Valley Injured Worker Legal Clinic, Inc. argues that it “has done nothing to suggest that the initial attorney fees were obtained as any type of misdeed.” (Petition, p. 3 1. 24). Furthermore, it argues that the 15% attorney fee award is res judicata regarding the issue and it was improper to reduce the attorney fee award to 12%. No other issues are raised by petitioner. There is no citation to any actual order regarding petitioner’s fees. Based upon our review of the record, and for the reasons set forth herein, we will dismiss petitioner’s Petition for Reconsideration because there is no final order which is subject to , reconsideration and petitioner is not presently aggrieved. We will deny pe
